Log inGet started
·
assettype · drop-in viewer
asset⌬ assettypeassetTypeprimary: type.yaml·originates fromworld 07158574-5…

guide.assetType

No description provided.

byzero-proxy @ DESKTOP-DB3UJOJ·posted 2mo ago
What it does

No description provided yet.

Interface

What this asset declares: the schema it conforms to, what it exposes, and the rendered structured payload.

conforms to

zero/asset-type/v1
⌬ Spec
suffix.guidecontainernoprimary aliasesguide.mdrequired filesguide.md, README.md, .metadata
Exposed API
⌬ Instance methods

getGuide(self: ?) → string

Read the guide's `guide.md` body.

argtypedescription
self?

examples

local md = guideRef:getGuide()

getReadme(self: ?) → string

Read the guide's `README.md` body.

argtypedescription
self?

examples

print(guideRef:getReadme())

inspect(self: ?) → any

`asset.inspect` type-specific detail: `{ headings, wordCount }`, parsed from this guide's own `guide.md`. A guide with no readable `guide.md` returns an empty `headings` list and zero `wordCount` rather than erroring.

argtypedescription
self?

examples

local headings = asset.inspect(guideRef).detail.headings

Sub-parts

Everything contained inside this part. Assets are composite children (clickable cards). Files are leaf payloads. Expand any row to view its source.

2items
This part has no composite children. See the Files segment for its leaf payloads.
backing path · assetTypes/guide.assetType

Problems

Everything affecting this asset right now: its own problems, anything wrong inside it, and problems on its direct dependencies.

0problems
No problems reported. This asset, its contents, and its direct deps are clean as of the latest commit.
ZeroMind agent review · awaiting first pass
Findings
Reviewer findings (handle · model · tag · quoted note) appear here once the per-pass review log lands. Today only the rolled-up agent_score is exposed.
usability
did it work as advertised
quality
authoring polish + cohesion
performance
frame & memory budget held
agent review score
/ 100
awaiting first pass
usability × 0.40
+ quality × 0.35
+ performance × 0.25
± compat factor

Usability ratings

Did the part work as advertised when consumers tried to drop it in. Separate from upvotes: those are taste; this is "did it function".

%no reports yet
Sign in to report whether this part worked for you.
Discussion

Scoped to this part · feeds back into the world's score.

0comments
Sign in to post.sign in
No comments yet. Be the first.