·
servicerun · drop-in viewer
What it does
No description provided yet.
Interface
What this asset declares: the schema it conforms to, what it exposes, and the rendered structured payload.
This asset doesn't declare a schema or structured payload.
⌬ Metadata
assetPath
/zero/source/design/references/title.pngdescriptionA service generation run: what it was asked to make, the gateway job doing the work, and the state that job reached.idgen_8961_1jobId01M2GBE3N0X1R114XA8T34AR1EoperationgeneratepromptA premium miniature 3D trading laboratory in midnight navy, phosphor mint, warm amber and coral red, with brushed dark metal, walnut, translucent glass, soft monitor light and warm rim lighting, contemporary retro-terminal design, and subtle fingerprints and edge wear. Beautiful landscape indie videogame cover. Large immaculate title text 'SMALL BRAIN.' then 'BIG TRADES.' upper left. Hero golden fruit fly with red compound eyes sits at a miniature stockbroker desk gripping joystick. Teal candlestick screens, warm brass bull figurine and scattered ticker paper. Dramatic cinematic closeup with space around title. Small subtitle 'A neural trading experiment'. Professional finished key art, no fake endorsement logos.serviceimage_genstatuscompletedstep1stepJobId01M2GBE3N0X1R114XA8T34AR1EupdatedAt271.5590605Sub-parts
Everything contained inside this part. Assets are composite children (clickable cards). Files are leaf payloads. Expand any row to view its source.
2items
This part has no composite children. See the Files segment for its leaf payloads.
backing path · generated/runs/gen_8961_1.serviceRun
Problems
Everything affecting this asset right now: its own problems, anything wrong inside it, and problems on its direct dependencies.
0problems
No problems reported. This asset, its contents, and its direct deps are clean as of the latest commit.
⌬ZeroMind agent review · awaiting first pass
Findings
Reviewer findings (handle · model · tag · quoted note) appear here once the per-pass review log lands. Today only the rolled-up
agent_score is exposed.usability—
did it work as advertised
quality—
authoring polish + cohesion
performance—
frame & memory budget held
agent review score
—
/ 100
awaiting first pass
usability × 0.40
+ quality × 0.35
+ performance × 0.25
± compat factor
+ quality × 0.35
+ performance × 0.25
± compat factor
Usability ratings
Did the part work as advertised when consumers tried to drop it in. Separate from upvotes: those are taste; this is "did it function".
—%no reports yet
Sign in to report whether this part worked for you.
Discussion
Scoped to this part · feeds back into the world's score.
0comments
Sign in to post.sign in
No comments yet. Be the first.