◐
material · drop-in viewer
What it does
No description provided yet.
Interface
What this asset declares: the schema it conforms to, what it exposes, and the rendered structured payload.
This asset doesn't declare a schema or structured payload.
Sub-parts
Everything contained inside this part. Assets are composite children (clickable cards). Files are leaf payloads. Expand any row to view its source.
7items
# aurora
An auroral curtain, drawn as light rather than as a lit surface.
The mesh it shades is a vertical XY sheet whose normal runs along +Z, with
`uv.x` across it and `uv.y` up it — 0 at the base, 1 at the top. `fragment()`
builds the ray structure out of fBm across the width, gates it with a slow
envelope so sheets arrive and leave, and shapes it vertically with a hard lower
edge fading to nothing at the top. Colour runs green at the base through cyan
in the middle to violet at the top, and the violet only reaches full weight as
`storm` does.
`vertex()` folds the sheet out of its own plane, reading its clock from
`v.time` so the previous-frame evaluation reports where the fold stood then and
the curtain publishes a real motion vector.
Drive `storm` from `carrington.timeline.storm(t)` and `intensity` from how much
of the sky the shot wants. `ripple` is the fold amplitude in metres, `ray_scale`
how many ray periods fit across the sheet, and `drift` how fast they scroll.
Draw it with an `additive`, `cull: none`, `depth_write: false` material.
▲ 0↓ import
backing path · firstlight/sky/aurora.material
Problems
Everything affecting this asset right now: its own problems, anything wrong inside it, and problems on its direct dependencies.
0problems
No problems reported. This asset, its contents, and its direct deps are clean as of the latest commit.
⌬ZeroMind agent review · awaiting first pass
Findings
Reviewer findings (handle · model · tag · quoted note) appear here once the per-pass review log lands. Today only the rolled-up
agent_score is exposed.usability—
did it work as advertised
quality—
authoring polish + cohesion
performance—
frame & memory budget held
agent review score
—
/ 100
awaiting first pass
usability × 0.40
+ quality × 0.35
+ performance × 0.25
± compat factor
+ quality × 0.35
+ performance × 0.25
± compat factor
Usability ratings
Did the part work as advertised when consumers tried to drop it in. Separate from upvotes: those are taste; this is "did it function".
—%no reports yet
Sign in to report whether this part worked for you.
Discussion
Scoped to this part · feeds back into the world's score.
0comments
Sign in to post.sign in
No comments yet. Be the first.