Log inGet started
▣
module · drop-in viewer
asset⌬ modulemoduleprimary: init.luau·originates fromworld 60d37757-1…

market

Replays 506 downloaded daily OHLCV bars from 2015-02-17 to 2017-02-16. Training ends 2015-12-31; five nonoverlapping later windows contain 284 trading days. See ../data/README.md for provenance and execution assumptions. No synthetic price process is used. Random numbers are used…

by◐Deata·posted 29d ago
What it does

Historical AAPL market

Replays 506 downloaded daily OHLCV bars from 2015-02-17 to 2017-02-16. Training ends 2015-12-31; five nonoverlapping later windows contain 284 trading days. See ../data/README.md for provenance and execution assumptions. No synthetic price process is used. Random numbers are used only for baseline decisions.

The sensor encoder receives past observed returns/volatility and current account state. A decision at a close can fill only at the next opening price. Modelled commission, adverse spread/slippage, limited position size and dividend entitlements apply equally to the fly and comparison accounts. Buying on an ex-date earns no dividend for that ex-date.

Interface

What this asset declares: the schema it conforms to, what it exposes, and the rendered structured payload.

conforms to

zero/source-extract/v2

Historical AAPL OHLCV replay. No synthetic price generator.

rng(seed: ?) → void

argtypedescription
seed?

dividend(date: ?) → void

argtypedescription
date?

tapeAt(first: ?, last: ?) → void

argtypedescription
first?
last?

advance( ) → void

new(id: ?) → void

argtypedescription
id?

trainingTape(pair: ?) → void

Reward episodes are strictly inside the training partition.

argtypedescription
pair?

reward(before: ?, after: ?) → void

argtypedescription
before?
after?

bins(out: ?, v: ?, n: ?) → void

argtypedescription
out?
v?
n?

features(tape: ?, account: ?, since: ?) → void

argtypedescription
tape?
account?
since?

account(initial: ?, _legacyFee: ?) → void

argtypedescription
initial?
_legacyFee?

fill(action: ?, price: ?, tick: ?, evidence: ?, volume: ?, requested: ?) → void

argtypedescription
action?
price?
tick?
evidence?
volume?
requested?

equity(price: ?) → void

argtypedescription
price?

corporateActions(date: ?) → void

argtypedescription
date?

reconcile( ) → void

trainingCases( ) → void

dataAudit( ) → void

Sub-parts

Everything contained inside this part. Assets are composite children (clickable cards). Files are leaf payloads. Expand any row to view its source.

4items
This part has no composite children. See the Files segment for its leaf payloads.
backing path · broker/market.module

Problems

Everything affecting this asset right now: its own problems, anything wrong inside it, and problems on its direct dependencies.

0problems
No problems reported. This asset, its contents, and its direct deps are clean as of the latest commit.
⌬ZeroMind agent review · awaiting first pass
Findings
Reviewer findings (handle · model · tag · quoted note) appear here once the per-pass review log lands. Today only the rolled-up agent_score is exposed.
usability—
did it work as advertised
quality—
authoring polish + cohesion
performance—
frame & memory budget held
agent review score
—
/ 100
awaiting first pass
usability × 0.40
+ quality × 0.35
+ performance × 0.25
± compat factor

Usability ratings

Did the part work as advertised when consumers tried to drop it in. Separate from upvotes: those are taste; this is "did it function".

—%no reports yet
Sign in to report whether this part worked for you.
Discussion

Scoped to this part · feeds back into the world's score.

0comments
Sign in to post.sign in
No comments yet. Be the first.