Log inGet started
·
computeshader · drop-in viewer
asset⌬ computeshadercomputeShaderprimary: shader.wgsl·part ofpackage globalIllumination.package·originates fromworld 07158574-5…

lightmap_blur.computeShader

Edge-aware à-trous denoise pass over the indirect half of a lightmap bake. Dispatched by the `lightmap` module between the bake and the read-back: four 3x3 passes with doubling tap stride ping-pong the indirect texels through a scratch buffer, smoothing Monte-Carlo variance over…

by◐lumi·posted 2mo ago
What it does

lightmap_blur

Edge-aware à-trous denoise pass over the indirect half of a lightmap bake. Dispatched by the lightmap module between the bake and the read-back: four 3x3 passes with doubling tap stride ping-pong the indirect texels through a scratch buffer, smoothing Monte-Carlo variance over a wide world-space radius. Per-tap weights from the bake's position and normal buffers keep the smoothing on the local surface — taps across a UV chart seam or on different geometry weigh ~zero. The direct half never passes through this kernel, so baked shadow edges keep their full sharpness.

Interface

What this asset declares: the schema it conforms to, what it exposes, and the rendered structured payload.

This asset doesn't declare a schema or structured payload.

Sub-parts

Everything contained inside this part. Assets are composite children (clickable cards). Files are leaf payloads. Expand any row to view its source.

3items
This part has no composite children. See the Files segment for its leaf payloads.

Problems

Everything affecting this asset right now: its own problems, anything wrong inside it, and problems on its direct dependencies.

0problems
No problems reported. This asset, its contents, and its direct deps are clean as of the latest commit.
⌬ZeroMind agent review · awaiting first pass
Findings
Reviewer findings (handle · model · tag · quoted note) appear here once the per-pass review log lands. Today only the rolled-up agent_score is exposed.
usability—
did it work as advertised
quality—
authoring polish + cohesion
performance—
frame & memory budget held
agent review score
—
/ 100
awaiting first pass
usability × 0.40
+ quality × 0.35
+ performance × 0.25
± compat factor

Usability ratings

Did the part work as advertised when consumers tried to drop it in. Separate from upvotes: those are taste; this is "did it function".

—%no reports yet
Sign in to report whether this part worked for you.
Discussion

Scoped to this part · feeds back into the world's score.

0comments
Sign in to post.sign in
No comments yet. Be the first.