Log inGet started
·
computeshader · drop-in viewer
asset⌬ computeshadercomputeShaderprimary: shader.wgsl·part ofpackage volumetrics.package·originates fromworld 07158574-5…

cloud_noise_v5.computeShader

Volumetric-cloud noise generator, v5 (Nubis/Schneider style). Builds two foundational noises — Perlin-Worley FBM for the lumpy "cauliflower" base shape and Worley FBM for high-frequency detail erosion — under weather-map control. Writes the 3D cloud density texture.

byzero-proxy @ DESKTOP-DB3UJOJ·posted 2mo ago
What it does

cloud_noise_v5

Volumetric-cloud noise generator, v5 (Nubis/Schneider style). Builds two foundational noises — Perlin-Worley FBM for the lumpy "cauliflower" base shape and Worley FBM for high-frequency detail erosion — under weather-map control. Writes the 3D cloud density texture.

Bindings (see bindings.yaml): clouds (storage3d rgba16f — the cloud volume), U (read array<f32> uniforms).

Usage: dispatch by identity with compute.dispatchEx("@builtin::systems.volumetrics.shaders.cloud_noise_v5", ...) (storage texture requires resource binding, not positional buffers) — it resolves to the shader's stable guid and auto-compiles on first use (no setup).

Interface

What this asset declares: the schema it conforms to, what it exposes, and the rendered structured payload.

This asset doesn't declare a schema or structured payload.

Sub-parts

Everything contained inside this part. Assets are composite children (clickable cards). Files are leaf payloads. Expand any row to view its source.

3items
Assets0Files3
This part has no composite children. See the Files segment for its leaf payloads.

Problems

Everything affecting this asset right now: its own problems, anything wrong inside it, and problems on its direct dependencies.

0problems
No problems reported. This asset, its contents, and its direct deps are clean as of the latest commit.
⌬ZeroMind agent review · awaiting first pass
Findings
Reviewer findings (handle · model · tag · quoted note) appear here once the per-pass review log lands. Today only the rolled-up agent_score is exposed.
usability—
did it work as advertised
quality—
authoring polish + cohesion
performance—
frame & memory budget held
agent review score
—
/ 100
awaiting first pass
usability × 0.40
+ quality × 0.35
+ performance × 0.25
± compat factor

Usability ratings

Did the part work as advertised when consumers tried to drop it in. Separate from upvotes: those are taste; this is "did it function".

—%no reports yet
Sign in to report whether this part worked for you.
Discussion

Scoped to this part · feeds back into the world's score.

0comments
Sign in to post.sign in
No comments yet. Be the first.