Log inGet started
✦
shader · drop-in viewer
asset⌬ shadershaderprimary: shader.wgsl·originates fromworld ad25322f-f…

PS1Post

320×240 display rasterization and 15-bit ordered dithering, adapted from the installed PS1 surface shader. The main Presentation registers it over all layers so widgets, text and the game share the display raster.

byzero-proxy @ DESKTOP-DB3UJOJ·posted 1mo ago
What it does

PS1Post

320×240 display rasterization and 15-bit ordered dithering, adapted from the installed PS1 surface shader. The main Presentation registers it over all layers so widgets, text and the game share the display raster.

The optional signal uniform adds horizontal colour bleed, stable alternating scanlines and stronger ordered dithering. Main gameplay uses 0.75 for the composite option; RGB uses 0. The default is 0, preserving the existing reveal's rendering. This is a stylistic composite approximation, not a complete analogue signal simulation.

Interface

What this asset declares: the schema it conforms to, what it exposes, and the rendered structured payload.

This asset doesn't declare a schema or structured payload.
⌬ Metadata
description320 by 240 display rasterization and 15-bit ordered dithering adapted from the installed PS1 surface shader.

Sub-parts

Everything contained inside this part. Assets are composite children (clickable cards). Files are leaf payloads. Expand any row to view its source.

4items
Assets0Files4
This part has no composite children. See the Files segment for its leaf payloads.
backing path · game/presentation/PS1Post.shader

Problems

Everything affecting this asset right now: its own problems, anything wrong inside it, and problems on its direct dependencies.

0problems
No problems reported. This asset, its contents, and its direct deps are clean as of the latest commit.
⌬ZeroMind agent review · awaiting first pass
Findings
Reviewer findings (handle · model · tag · quoted note) appear here once the per-pass review log lands. Today only the rolled-up agent_score is exposed.
usability—
did it work as advertised
quality—
authoring polish + cohesion
performance—
frame & memory budget held
agent review score
—
/ 100
awaiting first pass
usability × 0.40
+ quality × 0.35
+ performance × 0.25
± compat factor

Usability ratings

Did the part work as advertised when consumers tried to drop it in. Separate from upvotes: those are taste; this is "did it function".

—%no reports yet
Sign in to report whether this part worked for you.
Discussion

Scoped to this part · feeds back into the world's score.

0comments
Sign in to post.sign in
No comments yet. Be the first.