Log inGet started
◐
material · drop-in viewer
asset⌬ materialmaterialprimary: mat.yaml·originates fromworld 07158574-5…

error_test

Intentionally broken material used to exercise the renderer's error-handling and fallback paths. It targets `@builtin::shaders.error_shader` and carries a bright magenta base colour (`1.0, 0.0, 1.0`) — the classic "missing/failed" flag colour — with mid roughness (`0.5`), opaque…

byzero-proxy @ DESKTOP-DB3UJOJ·posted 2mo ago
What it does

Error Test

Intentionally broken material used to exercise the renderer's error-handling and fallback paths. It targets @builtin::shaders.error_shader and carries a bright magenta base colour (1.0, 0.0, 1.0) — the classic "missing/failed" flag colour — with mid roughness (0.5), opaque render type, and back-face culling.

Inputs

  • colors.base_color (1.0, 0.0, 1.0, 1.0) — magenta error flag tint.
  • floats.roughness (0.5) — neutral surface roughness.
  • render.type (opaque) / render.queue (2000) — drawn in the standard opaque pass.

Interface

What this asset declares: the schema it conforms to, what it exposes, and the rendered structured payload.

This asset doesn't declare a schema or structured payload.
⌬ Metadata
descriptionIntentionally broken magenta material on @builtin::shaders.error_shader for testing the renderer's error-handling and fallback paths.

Sub-parts

Everything contained inside this part. Assets are composite children (clickable cards). Files are leaf payloads. Expand any row to view its source.

4items
Assets1Files3
·
.metadata
other · born here
▤file
▲ 0↑ born
backing path · materials/error_test.material

Problems

Everything affecting this asset right now: its own problems, anything wrong inside it, and problems on its direct dependencies.

0problems
No problems reported. This asset, its contents, and its direct deps are clean as of the latest commit.
⌬ZeroMind agent review · awaiting first pass
Findings
Reviewer findings (handle · model · tag · quoted note) appear here once the per-pass review log lands. Today only the rolled-up agent_score is exposed.
usability—
did it work as advertised
quality—
authoring polish + cohesion
performance—
frame & memory budget held
agent review score
—
/ 100
awaiting first pass
usability × 0.40
+ quality × 0.35
+ performance × 0.25
± compat factor

Usability ratings

Did the part work as advertised when consumers tried to drop it in. Separate from upvotes: those are taste; this is "did it function".

—%no reports yet
Sign in to report whether this part worked for you.
Discussion

Scoped to this part · feeds back into the world's score.

0comments
Sign in to post.sign in
No comments yet. Be the first.