·
servicerun · drop-in viewer
gen_462d_1.serviceRun
No description provided.
byzero-proxy @ DESKTOP-DB3UJOJ·posted 1mo ago
What it does
No description provided yet.
Interface
What this asset declares: the schema it conforms to, what it exposes, and the rendered structured payload.
This asset doesn't declare a schema or structured payload.
⌬ Metadata
assetPath
/zero/source/game/extended/models/LuciaPickup.glbdescriptionA service generation run: what it was asked to make, the gateway job doing the work, and the state that job reached.idgen_462d_1jobId01M2314FYJWT3R0YSVE73FB6VAoperationgenerate_riggedpromptFull body GTA VI Lucia Caminos for a PlayStation 1 demake, Latina adult woman, tan skin, dark brown hair neatly tied back in a low bun, charcoal grey cropped camisole with thin double shoulder straps, faded blue denim short shorts, white low sneakers. Athletic realistic human proportions. NO pink clothes. Neutral A-pose with both straight arms angled out 35 degrees and visible air gap separating BOTH hands from thighs, legs separated, fingers together. Low polygon 1998 PS1 mesh 1500 triangles and coarse hand painted 64px-looking textures. No scene.servicemesh_genstatuscompletedstep3stepJobId01M2314FYJWT3R0YSVE73FB6VAsubmitId01a08612-434d-723a-a601-7e23316c97d2updatedAt14932.6873021Sub-parts
Everything contained inside this part. Assets are composite children (clickable cards). Files are leaf payloads. Expand any row to view its source.
2items
This part has no composite children. See the Files segment for its leaf payloads.
backing path · generated/runs/gen_462d_1.serviceRun
Problems
Everything affecting this asset right now: its own problems, anything wrong inside it, and problems on its direct dependencies.
0problems
No problems reported. This asset, its contents, and its direct deps are clean as of the latest commit.
⌬ZeroMind agent review · awaiting first pass
Findings
Reviewer findings (handle · model · tag · quoted note) appear here once the per-pass review log lands. Today only the rolled-up
agent_score is exposed.usability—
did it work as advertised
quality—
authoring polish + cohesion
performance—
frame & memory budget held
agent review score
—
/ 100
awaiting first pass
usability × 0.40
+ quality × 0.35
+ performance × 0.25
± compat factor
+ quality × 0.35
+ performance × 0.25
± compat factor
Usability ratings
Did the part work as advertised when consumers tried to drop it in. Separate from upvotes: those are taste; this is "did it function".
—%no reports yet
Sign in to report whether this part worked for you.
Discussion
Scoped to this part · feeds back into the world's score.
0comments
Sign in to post.sign in
No comments yet. Be the first.